Our site is on WordPress. Is that a problem?
No. Most of the issues we find on WordPress sites are plugin and template related and are straightforward to fix. Page builders make performance harder to optimise, but not impossible.
PILLAR ONEOF THE AUTHORITY ENGINE
Clears the path so search engines can reach, render and trust every page. If this layer is broken, content performance is capped no matter how good the content is.
yourproduct.com/pricing
What a visitor sees
Visitor view: a fully rendered page.
Technical SEO decides whether a search engine can reach your pages, render them, understand them and trust them.
Software companies have four structural problems that most businesses do not.
React, Next.js, Vue, Webflow. If content renders only in the browser, Google may never see it. We have audited sites where entire sections of a page were invisible in the raw HTML and nobody had noticed for a year.
Login screens, dashboards, account pages and gated content all sit alongside the pages meant to rank. Without deliberate rules, search engines crawl the wrong half of your site.
Every release is an opportunity to break something. Most SEO problems in software companies were introduced by a deploy, not by a strategy decision.
Old feature pages, deprecated integrations, campaign landing pages, staging leaks. Years of them, all diluting the site and consuming crawl budget.
None of this appears in a standard SEO audit template. All of it appears in ours.
Making sure search engines reach every page that should rank, and cannot reach the ones that should not.
Full crawl analysis compared against your sitemap. Index coverage analysis in Search Console, broken down by page type rather than viewed as one number. Robots.txt audit and rewrite. XML sitemap rebuild, split by content type. Index bloat identification, covering thin pages, parameter URLs, filtered views and staging leaks. Noindex and canonical rules for application, login and gated pages. Crawl budget analysis on larger sites. Orphan page discovery. Soft 404 and redirect chain resolution.
What you get
an indexation report, a cleaned robots.txt, rebuilt sitemaps, and documented index rules for every page type on your site.
We do not sell technical SEO by the hour. Hours invite you to count them, they cap the work at exactly the point it becomes useful, and they turn a system into a timesheet.
Scope is tied to output instead.
receives full technical implementation. Schema, rendering verification, internal link insertion, indexing request and confirmation, image optimisation, performance check. No page ships without it.
receives a full technical audit, prioritised remediation and implementation, up to the page ceiling for your plan.
technical maintenance continues across the whole site for the life of the engagement. New issues found are fixed, not logged for later.
CORE covers up to 250 existing pages. COVERAGE covers up to 1,000. AUTHORITY covers up to 5,000 across all markets.
250
CORE
1,000
COVERAGE
5,000
AUTHORITY
Pages we publish never count against this ceiling. It applies only to what existed before we started.
Month 1
Full Stack SEO Audit covering technical, content, competitive and commercial layers, written in plain language rather than jargon. Prioritised action plan. Presentation call walking you through it.
Months 1-2
Technical implementation. Architecture corrected, indexation cleaned, link architecture applied, schema deployed, performance fixed.
Ongoing
Every published page technically implemented. Monthly technical monitoring log. Before and after verification on every fix. Full re-audit every six months.
Most technical SEO engagements end with a document. Forty recommendations handed to a development team that already has a backlog. Six months later three of them are done, rankings have not moved, and the SEO agency and the development team each blame the other.
We implement directly where we have access. Where your team prefers to own a change, they get a proper specification with acceptance criteria, and we review the code before it ships.
This is the part of the work that most often does not happen. It is the reason most technical audits produce nothing.
Typical agency
SEO Audit, 40 recommendations
Raazi Tech
yourproduct.com
Questions
No. Most of the issues we find on WordPress sites are plugin and template related and are straightforward to fix. Page builders make performance harder to optimise, but not impossible.
Yes, and this is where we add the most value. Rendering issues on JavaScript frameworks are the most common cause of content that exists but does not rank, and they are the issues most agencies cannot diagnose.
Not necessarily. We implement directly where we have access, which is faster. Where you would rather your own team owned changes, we provide specifications and review the code afterwards.
We work in staging where one exists, we take a baseline before any structural change, and we monitor for two weeks after. Migration safety is a service we sell, so our own work has to meet that standard.
We offer a standalone Full Stack SEO Audit. Ongoing technical work is part of the system rather than a separate retainer, because technical work without content produces a fast site that still does not rank.
Builds every page so machines understand its meaning, not just its words.
Maps your entire subject and covers it in sequence, until your site becomes the source.
Builds the external recognition that makes everything else credible.
Puts you inside the answers buyers get from ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI.
No sales sequence. Just the results.
The AI visibility check tells you where you appear when buyers ask an AI about software in your category. Free, three working days, no call required.
If you would rather start with the technical picture, the Full Stack SEO Audit is available as a standalone engagement.